Title of article - Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection on Pathological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer: The ALaCaRT Randomized Clinical Trial.
Abstract
Laparoscopic procedures are generally thought to have better outcomes than open procedures. Because of anatomical constraints, laparoscopic rectal resection may not be better because of limitations in performing an adequate cancer resection.
CLICK HERE for Full article Click button above to go to original article link with complete article details for Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection on Pathological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer: The ALaCaRT Randomized Clinical Trial.
Please CLICK HERE to discuss with us on facebook about this article.
Click below for Details of research Institute
Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia2Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Details of Journal for Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection on Pathological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer: The ALaCaRT Randomized Clinical Trial.
Journal Title - JAMA
ISSN - 1538-3598
Volume - 314
Issue - 13
Publish date - 2015-Oct
Language - eng
Country - United States
No comments:
Post a Comment